
OVERVIEWS
While there have been many studies examining different aspects of gender altering interventions, the numerous systematic reviews also have something to tell.

Documented Harms
Emerging and accumulating safety signals for the use of estrogen among transgender women.
Lauren Schwartz et. al.
While previous reviews highlight the low-quality evidence supporting benefits, this recent review focuses on the substantial, documented safety signals pointing towards potential direct harms. It synthesized data from over 50 studies, covering both long-acknowledged risks and emerging signals
Psycho-social Outlook
Masculinising and feminising hormone interventions for adolescents experiencing gender dysphoria or incongruence: a systematic review
Jo Taylor, et. al.
Psychosocial Functioning in Transgender Youth after 2 Years of Hormones
Diane Chen, et. al.
Several systematic reviews of the existing literature have shown a wide range of problems: a lack of randomized prospective trial design, small sample sizes, recruitment biases, short duration of subject follow-up, high dropout rates, psychometrically inadequate measurement instruments, uncontrolled confounding, and lack of appropriate controls.
Documented Harms
While previous reviews highlight the low-quality evidence supporting benefits, this recent review focuses on the substantial, documented safety signals pointing towards potential direct harms. It synthesized data from over 50 studies, covering both long-acknowledged risks and emerging signals
This review provides a strong, evidence-based counterpoint to prevailing narratives, shifting the focus from contentious benefits to documented harms. As the chapter on ethics from the recently-released HHS report made clear, the ethics of an intervention are very different when the benefits are very uncertain and the risks much less so. What this review shows beyond doubt is that, at least among males, cross-sex hormones make little sense, if a medical professional wants to practice ethics-informed medicine. For example, if adults want to smoke, claiming that it gives them relief, that is their choice. But that does not mean that doctors will have to prescribe tobacco just because someone wishes to get it.
These are the key highlights of the study:
Extensive Risk Profile: It details a wide range of significant risk signals, including severe cardiovascular issues (venous thromboembolism, ischemic stroke), fertility problems, autoimmune diseases (lupus, rheumatoid arthritis, systemic sclerosis), various cancers (testicular, breast, thyroid), pancreatitis, and even potential cognitive decline and depression.
Substantial Risk Increases with long-term usage: These above-mentioned risks aren't minor issues. The review highlights data suggesting significant risk increases, some doubling, others potentially rising over 40-fold, especially with long-term use. For example, one large cohort study found that the risk of VTE became 5.1 times higher after two years, and the risk of ischemic stroke rose to nearly 10 times higher after six years. (Compare this to the pain medication Vioxx, which had an approximate relative risk of 1.84 for MI/stroke in the trial leading to its withdrawal, and Merck, its manufacturer, had to pay a nearly $5 billion in settlements.)
Challenging the Benefit Narrative: The paper reinforces the lack of robust evidence for benefits, particularly noting studies (like Chen 2023 in the NEJM) showing no psychosocial improvement in male adolescents and even a re-analysis (of Turban's study in PLOS ONE by Michael Biggs) indicating increased suicidality in natal males on estrogen.
Addressing Autonomy Arguments: Implicitly, it confronts the recent shift towards autonomy-based justifications, arguing that the sheer scope and severity of these lifelong systemic harms present a fundamentally different ethical challenge compared to procedures with well-established safety profiles. It underscores the medical principle of non-maleficence.
The following is a summary of key adverse outcomes and emerging safety signals from the medical literature.
Cardiovascular Risks Estrogen therapy is consistently linked to severe and escalating cardiovascular dangers.
Blood Clots (VTE): A major, well-documented risk. One review concluded estrogen therapy increases the risk of Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) over fivefold (Irwig, 2018). A large cohort study found that the VTE risk was 4.6 times higher than in other men (Nota et al., 2019).
Stroke: The risk of ischemic stroke is significantly elevated. One meta-analysis found a 30% higher incidence (van Zijverden et al., 2024), and another major study reported an 80% increased risk compared to other men (Nota et al., 2019).
Escalating Long-Term Risk: The danger increases dramatically over time. One study found that after 6 years of use, the risk of ischemic stroke rose to nearly 10 times higher than in the non-estrogen-using male population. The VTE risk became 5.1 times higher after 2 years (Getahun et al., 2018).
Retinal Vein Occlusion: Case reports link estrogen therapy to branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO), a cause of sudden vision loss (Andzembe et al., 2023).
Cancer Risks
Evidence points to a substantially increased risk of several cancers.
Breast Cancer: A meta-analysis found the standardized incidence ratio (SIR) for breast cancer was over 40 times higher in individuals on estrogen compared to other men (Corso et al., 2023).
Testicular Cancer: Histopathological studies of removed testes have found rates of germ cell neoplasms that are alarmingly high. One analysis calculated an annual incidence 26.5 times higher than that of the general male population (Shanker et al., 2024).
Meningioma (Brain Tumor): An analysis of the French pharmacovigilance database found that meningiomas were the principal adverse drug reaction reported for individuals on feminizing hormones (Yelehe et al., 2022).
Thyroid Cancer: One study of US veterans found a higher prevalence of thyroid cancer compared to non-transgender men, with a higher incidence of the more aggressive Hürthle cell cancer subtype (Christensen et al., 2024).
Fertility & Reproductive Harms
Estrogen causes profound and often permanent damage to the male reproductive system.
Infertility & Testicular Atrophy: Estrogen therapy suppresses sperm production, leading to infertility. It causes atrophic changes in the testes, including smaller seminiferous tubules, hyalinization (tissue hardening), and fibrosis (De Roo et al., 2025).
Abnormal Sperm & DNA Damage: The treatment results in higher proportions of sperm abnormalities, including low count, poor motility, and azoospermia (no sperm). Analysis of testicular tissue after orchiectomy revealed that 65% of cases showed cellular atypia mimicking germ cell neoplasia (a precursor to cancer) (Riva-Morales et al., 2025).
Neurological & Cognitive Risks
Estrogen is associated with concerning structural and functional changes in the brain.
Brain Volume Loss: Multiple studies show that estrogen use is associated with a decrease in total brain volume and an increase in ventricle size (Hulshoff Pol et al., 2006; Seiger et al., 2016). Animal studies suggest this may be due to a loss of water content in brain cells (Gómez et al., 2020).
Cognitive Impairment: A long-term study found that older individuals who had been on estrogen for an average of 28.5 years had lower scores in information-processing speed and episodic memory compared to both male and female controls (van Heesewijk et al., 2023).
Lowered BDNF: Estrogen use has been associated with reduced serum levels of Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor (BDNF), a protein crucial for brain health. Lower BDNF is linked to an increased risk of Major Depressive Disorder (Fuss et al., 2015).
Metabolic & Autoimmune Risks
Diabetes & Insulin Resistance: Estrogen therapy is associated with increased fat mass and worsened insulin resistance. One study found that HOMA-IR, a key marker of insulin resistance, increased by 72% within the first year of treatment (Colizzi et al., 2015).
Pancreatitis: Case studies link estrogen use to both hypertriglyceridemia-induced and gallstone pancreatitis (Chaudhry et al., 2021; Freier et al., 2021).
Autoimmune Disease: Case reports describe new onset or severe worsening of autoimmune conditions like Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) and Systemic Sclerosis (Salgado et al., 2022). One large study found a 6.6-fold increased rate of Multiple Sclerosis (MS) (Pakpoor et al., 2016).
Mortality
Increased All-Cause Mortality: A landmark five-decade Dutch cohort study found that individuals on feminizing hormones had a significantly higher overall mortality risk (SMR 1.8) compared to men in the general population. This gap in survival widened over time. The leading causes of death were cardiovascular disease (21%) and cancer (32%) (de Blok et al., 2021).
Conclusion: The use of feminizing hormones in natal males is linked to a wide array of life-altering and life-threatening harms. These include dramatically increased risks for cardiovascular events, various cancers, irreversible infertility, brain changes, and overall mortality. The severity and breadth of these safety signals underscore the need for extreme caution and transparent, comprehensive informed consent.
Schwartz, L., Lal, M., Cohn, J. et al. Emerging and accumulating safety signals for the use of estrogen among transgender women. Discov Ment Health 5, 88 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44192-025-00216-3
References
Andzembe, V., Miere, A., Zambrowski, O., Glacet-Bernard, A., & Souied, E. H. (2023). Branch retinal vein occlusion secondary to hormone replacement therapy in a transgender woman. Journal Français d'Ophtalmologie, 46(2), 148–151.
Chaudhry, A., Yelisetti, R., Millet, C., Biggiani, C., & Upadhyay, S. (2021). Acute pancreatitis in the transgender population. Cureus, 13(7), e16140.
Christensen, J. D., Basheer, H. T., & Lado Abeal, J. J. (2024). Thyroid cancer prevalence, risk exposure, and clinical features among transgender female veterans. Journal of the Endocrine Society, 8(6), bvae060.
Colizzi, M., Costa, R., Scaramuzzi, F., Palumbo, C., Tyropani, M., Pace, V., & Todarello, O. (2015). Concomitant psychiatric problems and hormonal treatment induced metabolic syndrome in gender dysphoria individuals: A 2 year follow-up study. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 78(4), 399–406.
Corso, G., Gandini, S., D'Ecclesiis, O., Mazza, M., Magnoni, F., Veronesi, P., & Lazzeroni, M. (2023). Risk and incidence of breast cancer in transgender individuals: a systematic review and meta-analysis. European Journal of Cancer Prevention, 32(3), 207–214.
de Blok, C. J. M., Wiepjes, C. M., van Velzen, D. M., Staphorsius, A. S., Nota, N. M., Gooren, L. J., Kreukels, B. P. C., & den Heijer, M. (2021). Mortality trends over five decades in adult transgender people receiving hormone treatment: a report from the Amsterdam cohort of gender dysphoria. The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology, 9(10), 663–670.
De Roo, C., Schneider, F., Stolk, T. H. R., Van Vugt, W. L. J., Stoop, D., & Van Mello, N. M. (2025). Fertility in transgender and gender diverse people: systematic review of the effects of gender-affirming hormones on reproductive organs and fertility. Human Reproduction Update, 31(3), 183–217.
Freier, E., Kassel, L., Rand, J., & Chinnakotla, B. (2021). Estrogen-induced gallstone pancreatitis in a transgender female. American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, 78(18), 1674–1680.
Fuss, J., Hellweg, R., Van Caenegem, E., Briken, P., Stalla, G. K., T'Sjoen, G., & Auer, M. K. (2015). Cross-sex hormone treatment in male-to-female transsexual persons reduces serum brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF). European Neuropsychopharmacology, 25(1), 95–99.
Getahun, D., Nash, R., Flanders, W. D., Baird, T. C., Becerra-Culqui, T. A., Cromwell, L., Loo, R. K., Lohman, W. G., Quinn, V. P., Robinson, B., Roblin, D., Silverberg, M. J., Safer, J., Slovis, J., Tangpricha, V., & Goodman, M. (2018). Cross-sex hormones and acute cardiovascular events in transgender persons. Annals of Internal Medicine, 169(4), 205–213.
Gómez, Á., Cerdán, S., Pérez-Laso, C., Ortega, E., Pásaro, E., Fernández, R., & Guillamon, A. (2020). Effects of adult male rat feminization treatments on brain morphology and metabolomic profile. Hormones and Behavior, 125, 104839.
Hulshoff Pol, H. E., Cohen-Kettenis, P. T., Van Haren, N. E. M., Peper, J. S., Brans, R. G. H., Cahn, W., Schnack, H. G., Gooren, L. J. G., & Kahn, R. S. (2006). Changing your sex changes your brain: influences of testosterone and estrogen on adult human brain structure. European Journal of Endocrinology, 155(Suppl_1), S107–S114.
Irwig, M. S. (2018). Cardiovascular health in transgender people. Reviews in Endocrine & Metabolic Disorders, 19(3), 243–251.
Nota, N. M., Wiepjes, C. M., de Blok, C. J. M., Gooren, L. J. G., Kreukels, B. P. C., & den Heijer, M. (2019). Occurrence of acute cardiovascular events in transgender individuals receiving hormone therapy. Circulation, 139(11), 1461–1462.
Pakpoor, J., Wotton, C. J., Schmierer, K., Giovannoni, G., & Goldacre, M. J. (2016). Gender identity disorders and multiple sclerosis risk: a national record-linkage study. Multiple Sclerosis Journal, 22(13), 1759–1762.
Riva-Morales, I. D. L., Gama, A., Zhou, R., Choy, B., Isaila, B., Nezami, B. G., Torous, V., Wu, R., Netto, G. J., & Epstein, J. I. (2025). Clinicopathologic analysis and digital pathology evaluation of orchiectomy specimens in gender-affirmation surgery. Pathology, Research and Practice, 269, 155914.
Salgado, E., Romera-Baurés, M., Beltran-Catalan, E., Naredo, E., Carreira, P. E., Garcia-Vivar, M., Garcia-Gomez, C., Holgado, S., Joven, B., Loza, E., & Castellvi, I. (2022). Immune-mediated inflammatory rheumatic diseases in transgender people: a scoping review. Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism, 52, 151920.
Seiger, R., Hahn, A., Hummer, A., Kranz, G. S., Ganger, S., Woletz, M., ... & Lanzenberger, R. (2016). Subcortical gray matter changes in transgender subjects after long-term cross-sex hormone administration. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 74, 371-379.
Shanker, E. M., Ren, Q., Zhao, L. C., Bluebond-Langner, R., & Deng, F. M. (2024). Exploring the incidence of testicular neoplasms in the transgender population: a case series. Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.5858/arpa.20240218-OA
van Heesewijk, J., Dreijerink, K., Wiepjes, C., Kok, A., Geurtsen, G., van Schoor, N., & Huisman, M. (2023). Cognitive functioning after long-term gender-affirming hormone therapy—a study in older transgender individuals. EPATH 2023 Conference. Killarney, Ireland.
van Zijverden, L. M., Wiepjes, C. M., Van Diemen, J. J. K., Thijs, A., & Den Heijer, M. (2024). Cardiovascular disease in transgender people: a systematic review and meta-analysis. European Journal of Endocrinology, 190(2), S13-S24.
Yelehe, M., Klein, M., El Aridi, L., Maurier, A., Gillet, P., & Feigerlova, E. (2022). Adverse effects of gender-affirming hormonal therapy in transgender persons: Assessing reports in the French pharmacovigilance database. Fundamental & Clinical Pharmacology, 36(6), 1116-1124.
Psycho-social Outlook
Several systematic reviews of the existing literature have shown a wide range of problems: a lack of randomized prospective trial design, small sample sizes, recruitment biases, short duration of subject follow-up, high dropout rates, psychometrically inadequate measurement instruments, uncontrolled confounding, and lack of appropriate controls.
Several systematic reviews of the existing literature (including the latest that was part of the series of systematic reviews commissioned by the Cass Review in the UK [Taylor, et al., 2024]) have shown estrogen in natal males does not help with their psychosocial outlook.
The first (and, to date, only) clinical study (i.e., a study that recruits actual subjects and follows them clinically rather than rely on anonymous, online, non-probability surveys) in a US setting among adolescents that promotes CSHT failed to show any improvement in psychosocial outcomes (depression, anxiety, and life satisfaction) among "youth designated male at birth" (Chen et al., 2023).
Estrogen also does not improve physiological outcomes, as demonstrated in recent literature in disciplines as varied as neuroscience, endocrinology, neuroendocrinology, and psychoneuroendocrinology. In fact, estrogen introduces many causes of concern. The situation becomes dramatically worse after surgery.
Chen, D., Berona, J., Chan, Y.-M., Ehrensaft, D., Garofalo, R., Hidalgo, M. A., Rosenthal, S. M., Tishelman, A. C., & Olson-Kennedy, J. (2023). Psychosocial functioning in transgender youth after 2 years of hormones. New England Journal of Medicine, 388(3), 240–250. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2206297
Taylor, J., Mitchell, A., Hall, R., Langton, T., & Fraser, L. (2024). Masculinising and feminising hormone interventions for adolescents experiencing gender dysphoria or incongruence: A systematic review. Archives of Disease in Childhood. https://adc.bmj.com/content/early/2024/04/09/archdischild-2023-326670
